When India’s Top Diplomat Sounds Like Khadim Rizvi

India’s foreign minister sparks backlash with undiplomatic remarks, exposing insecurity as Pakistan gains ground in regional diplomacy

When India’s Top Diplomat Sounds Like Khadim Rizvi

A sharp exchange of rhetoric has erupted between Pakistan and India after Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar dismissed Islamabad’s diplomatic role by saying New Delhi would not act as a “dalal nation”, prompting a wave of pointed and often biting responses from politicians, officials, analysts and journalists on both sides.

The controversy comes amid reports that Pakistan has been facilitating backchannel diplomacy between the United States and Iran during the ongoing Middle East conflict, positioning itself as a potential mediator.

Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif reacted with a characteristically sharp retort, saying Jaishankar “thinks of himself as a hi-fi dalal” and that his remarks “reflect personal frustration”.

Presidential spokesperson Murtaza Solangi sharply criticised the remarks. stating: “Babu Jaishankar knows that when he is not at the table, he is on the menu.” He also earlier criticised the Indian minister’s tone, suggesting it reflected a breakdown in diplomatic restraint.

Security analyst Ali K Chishti framed the issue as one of insecurity rather than strategy, writing: “Imagine calling peace efforts ‘dalaali’ just because you weren’t invited to the table. That’s not diplomacy, that’s insecurity. Exposes Indians. Sore crybabies and looser!”

Nuclear expert Dr. Rabia Akhtar criticised the remarks, saying: “Ouch! One doesn’t accidentally arrive at such language, ladies and gentlemen. To reduce mediation to ‘dalali’ suggests a familiarity with that frame perhaps because it is the only lens through which India understands statecraft. After all, you can only describe the world using the vocabulary you are most fluent in.”

Journalists also joined the chorus. Asma Shirazi wrote: “Grapes are sour and defeat is unforgettable,” while Gharidah Farooqi described the language as “bizarre” for a senior diplomat. 

Criticism also emerged from within India. Journalist Smita Sharma questioned the tone, asking: “What kind of a language is this to begin with?”

Congress leader Pawan Khera highlighted the inconsistency, saying: “Was India a ‘broker country’ when Modi was desperate to mediate between Russia and Ukraine? Selective brokering or selective memory?”

Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi more broadly, arguing: “Our foreign policy is PM Modi’s personal foreign policy… everybody considers this a universal joke.”

Meanwhile, commentary on social media also reflected growing concern over regional escalation. One user warned: “Pakistan has a very legitimate security concern if escalation continues because US–Israel may not hesitate to drop nukes on Iran. As a bordering country, it will be catastrophic for Pakistan.”