• About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us
Friday, July 1, 2022
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Analysis

Our Farce Of Civilian Supremacy

Imran Khan is not arguing for civilian supremacy. He is accusing the army's top brass not intervening—in his favour—in the political crisis that led to his ouster, writes Umer Farooq

Umer Farooq by Umer Farooq
May 16, 2022
in Analysis, Perspective
Our Farce Of Civilian Supremacy
315
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In June 2010, US President Barack Obama fired his commander of multinational forces in Afghanistan, Gen Stanley McChrystal, for insubordination. The general had made a disparaging comment about the President which was quoted in a media report. This and countless other examples from around the world could be quoted to bring home the point that civilian supremacy and the apolitical nature of a military top brass are absolute essentials for a democracy. In March 2022, the then Prime Minister Imran Khan said that a foreign power — he didn’t name the United States but it was obvious that he was accusing Washington — threatened him with consequences for visiting Moscow. He also accused the foreign power of conspiring to dislodge him through a no-confidence motion.

Then, on 01 April 2022, the country’s army chief delivered a speech at a security forum in Islamabad and dubbed the United States as a long-standing strategic partner. As noted by commentators, General Bajwa’s comments were clearly the rejection of the Prime Minister’s allegations against Washington. Ironically nobody in the media or political circles — not even the prime minister himself — took notice of this divergent position. In fact, in the post-ouster situation, Imran Khan’s diatribes against the army top brass don’t in any way relate to the principle of civilian supremacy. On the other hand, he is actually complaining against the army top brass for not intervening—in his favour—in the political crisis that led to his ouster. “After I came to know about this conspiracy, I sent my finance minister to the people who call themselves ‘neutral’ [a code word for the Army top brass] that our weak economic recovery will go down the drain if this conspiracy to dislodge me is not prevented.” This means that Imran Khan didn’t see General Bajwa’s public comments as violating his political position.

It was a curious situation that a prime minister accused a foreign power of conspiring to dislodge him, while the chief of the army staff declared that foreign power as a “strategic partner.” But Imran Khan didn’t seem to bother about General Bajwa’s speech or its content. He was only interested in forcing General Bajwa to use the immense political and coercive power at his disposal to defeat the no-confidence motion against him. He was not interested in eradicating the dysfunctionality of Pakistan’s political system. He was only interested in seeing the general intervene on his behalf – and in the process making the political system more dysfunctional.

Only a few days back, the military spokesman said in a statement that Pakistan’s law prohibits the Pakistani military from interfering in politics. The military spokesman’s latest statement seems only to relate to the ongoing political crisis, wherein Imran Khan expressed his dejection over the army’s failure to protect his government, while the army spokesman is taking the position that they could not have intervened on account of a legal prohibition on the army not to play politics or interfere in political matters.

Imran Khan’s unclear wish came out of his experience with the military in the post-2104 “soft intervention” where Pakistani intelligence services allegedly actively worked behind the scene to remove Nawaz Sharif from power. He knows the immense political and coercive power at the disposal of army top brass and how effective they have used it in the past. He wanted the army’s repeat performance on this.

On the other hand, the military spokesman has reduced the apolitical nature of the army to a dreary legal concept, devoid of any political purpose that this organic political concept is supposed to serve. The army’s apolitical nature is not meant to serve any ritualistic and abstract objective. It is grounded and based on the expectation that the country should have a vibrant strategic culture, in sync with the political, security and strategic interests of the society and state, as defined by a fully representative political elite.

Pakistan’s strategic and foreign policy culture has never been representative of the political impulses of the society. The military has ruled directly for more than 30 years, and in the post-Musharraf period, virtually controlled the foreign policy. Decision-making in the realm of security, both internal and external, has resided completely with the GHQ, and in the process, the prioritisation of the military’s institutional interests took place. Part of the problem is that the civilian elite is both incapable and uninterested in asserting themselves on strategic issues. The political elite is happy to restrict themselves to partially controlling non-strategic ministries and issues and ceding completely the decision-making process on strategic issues to the military. They don’t seem to bother if the military or its top brass impinge on their jurisdiction on strategic or foreign policy issues. The prime and latest example is how Imran Khan completely ignored General Bajwa’s speech, in which he dubbed Washington a strategic partner within days of Imran Khan accusing the United States of conspiring against his government.

Nawaz Sharif is no less non-serious: he aggressively criticised army generals in his online speeches from London. But didn’t say a word on foreign policy.

In 2009, the PPP-led government through its cabinet vested the power to negotiate and use force against terrorist organisations and militants to the then COAS. The power still resides in the army chief’s office. With the active permission of successive governments, the successive COAS acted as a diplomat-in-chief of the country. The end result is a myopic foreign-policymaking process. It is for these reasons that the political system is dysfunctional and non-representative.

Civilian supremacy and the apolitical nature of the army have turned into a farce now – the kind that does not even induce laughter. This dysfunctionality is not only corroding the political system and pushing it over the brink, but it is also leading the security institutions towards over-politicisation, from which they are finding hard to recover.

Also Read:

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

The Rocky Road Ahead For The Party In Power

Tags: civilianchangesupremacyArmystatesmilitaryforeignformerprimeunitedministerchiefimranpolicykhanbajwashehbazconspiracynawazregimesharif
Previous Post

Fighting Cancer Taught Me About Resilience, Kindness And Gratitude – I

Next Post

Amid The Heat Wave Protesters Led By AWP Are Demanding Urgent Climate Action In Islamabad

Umer Farooq

Umer Farooq

The writer is a journalist based in Islamabad.

Next Post
Amid The Heat Wave Protesters Led By AWP Are Demanding Urgent Climate Action In Islamabad

Amid The Heat Wave Protesters Led By AWP Are Demanding Urgent Climate Action In Islamabad

Comments 4

  1. Cautiously Optimistic says:
    2 months ago

    Two thoughts:
    – the U.S. has effectively controlled our strings since 1950, initially military and progressively civilian, there is little ‘independence’ that either can exercise
    – which civilian/political leaderships have we seen that had a fleeting semblance of competence and motivation to serve the people (not their personal, biradri or halqa interests)

    Therefore, drawing parallels of civilian-military supremacy between Pakistan and other countries is not fair.

  2. Khurram Ayub says:
    2 months ago

    To further the conclusion above army has an apolitical yet strategic role in issues relating to foreign policy and integrity of the state. Army needs to come out of its shell. This has a direct impact on our response to the economic crises.

  3. Mansoor Nasir says:
    2 months ago

    When we hand the command of our foreign, economic, internal, financial, education decisions to matric pass duffers’ and expect a better Pakistan, who are the fools?

    • Cautiously Optimistic says:
      1 month ago

      Matric pass – from the cheating or non-cheating area of examinations?

      I am told that even in professional colleges the two are separated. Graduates from the latter proudly declare this along with their qualifications.

Search

No Result
View All Result

Recent News

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

July 1, 2022
TLP Workers On Streets Once Again, Destroy Samsung Billboards In Karachi Over ‘Blasphemous’ QR Code

TLP Workers On Streets Once Again, Destroy Samsung Billboards In Karachi Over ‘Blasphemous’ QR Code

July 1, 2022
Long Overdue: Pakistan’s Apology To Bangladesh For The War Of 1971

Long Overdue: Pakistan’s Apology To Bangladesh For The War Of 1971

July 1, 2022

Twitter

Donate Us

Subscribe
The Friday Times – Naya Daur

News and views which are not fit to print.


The Friday Times is Pakistan’s first independent weekly, founded in 1989. In 2021, the publication went into collaboration with digital news platform Naya Daur Media to publish under a daily cycle.


Social Media

Latest News

  • All
  • News
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Lifestyle
PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

by News Desk
July 1, 2022
0

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has told the Supreme Court...

TLP Workers On Streets Once Again, Destroy Samsung Billboards In Karachi Over ‘Blasphemous’ QR Code

TLP Workers On Streets Once Again, Destroy Samsung Billboards In Karachi Over ‘Blasphemous’ QR Code

by News Desk
July 1, 2022
0

Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) workers held violent protests and...

Follow Us on Instagram

Follow

    The Instagram Access Token is expired, Go to the Customizer > JNews : Social, Like & View > Instagram Feed Setting, to refresh it.
  • About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist