• About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us
Friday, July 1, 2022
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Analysis

Monarchs, Presidents And Governors: How Discretion Works

"Unlike the UK, in our system of constitutional governance, the President’s powers have been limited and the President has to act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or the Prime Minister," writes Ali Tahir

Ali Tahir by Ali Tahir
April 25, 2022
in Analysis, Perspective
Monarchs, Presidents And Governors: How Discretion Works
86
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The United Kingdom’s constitution is uncodified. Theoretically, all legal powers are exercised in the name of the monarch, currently the Queen. The Queen enjoys wide powers, including the power of the appointment of the Prime Minister. There are no bars to the power penned down in the Constitution or a statute, so the Queen may choose any person in the world to be the Prime Minister, but this has never been done.

The Queen is bound by a constitutional convention, and the appointed Prime Minister is always the person who is best placed to command the confidence of the majority in the House of Commons. More often than not, it is the leader of the political party which wins a majority of the seats in an election. Even where there is a political impasse, for example when there is a hung Parliament, the monarch leaves it to the politicians to come up with a solution, rather than act in an arbitrary manner or in a completely discretionary manner, for instance the appointment of Winston Churchill in 1940.

When it is clear as to who commands the confidence of the majority in the House of Commons, the exercise of the Queen’s power is mechanical. Let’s take the example of Theresa May or Boris Johnson: both were the leaders of their party, and when their party was in majority in the House of Commons, they were appointed to the Prime Minister’s office without any commotion. This all happened in a democracy where the rules were not predefined and written.

Pakistan, of course, could not work with a monarch. We are a republic and the preamble to our Constitution clearly states that the sovereignty over the entire universe belongs to Almighty Allah alone, and the authority of the republic is to be exercised by the chosen representatives of the people. Nevertheless, for the parliamentary system to work, the Islamic republic must have had an impartial and non-partisan head of the state, unlike a monarch, the symbol of the unity of the federation and in whose name all the powers of the republic were to be exercised. In our constitutional scheme this job was subscribed to the President. This is also the reason that a President, who is seen as impartial and of unimpeachable integrity can only be removed from office on grounds of physical or mental incapacity or impeached on a charge of violating the Constitution or gross misconduct, and that too by a two-thirds majority of a joint sitting of Parliament, the sort of majority by which the Constitution itself can be amended.

Nevertheless, unlike the UK, in our system of constitutional governance, the President’s powers have been limited and the President has to act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or the Prime Minister. In the same way, unlike his counterpart in the UK, the President is not free to appoint anybody as the Prime Minister, but a candidate that has been elected by the votes of the majority of the total membership of the National Assembly. Once that is done, it is the constitutional responsibility of the President to call on the winning candidate, commanding confidence of the majority in the National Assembly, to assume office as the Prime Minister after taking oath before the President. The President then also has to take an oath from the ministers chosen by the Prime Minister to be a part of his cabinet. The President has to set aside any political misgivings and enmity and act as per the Constitution.

Since 2008, when democracy returned to Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf administered an oath to his political nemesis: so did Asif Zardari and Mamnoon Hussain. It is unfortunate, that despite a constitutional directive, this was not done in Pakistan when the President did not administer an oath to the Prime Minister elect Shahbaz Sharif citing health issues, and despite absence of a constitutional directive this principle has never been breached in the UK.

Just as in the federation, in the provinces an impartial and non-partisan Governor sits as the head of the province. The executive authority of the province is exercised in his name, but he has to act on the aid and advice of the Chief Minister and his cabinet. Just like the President, the Governor too is bound by constitutional directive to administer an oath of office to a Chief Minister who has been elected by a majority of the total membership of the provincial assembly. The governor has no powers under the Constitution to act as an investigator, neither does he possess any veto powers of the directives of the elected provincial assembly. Once Hamza Shahbaz Sharif was elected by the provincial assembly and notified as such, the Governor was under a constitutional responsibility to call him to assume the office of the Chief Minister and take an oath before him.

I do not know if, by the time that this column is published, the Governor would have taken an oath from the Chief Minister elect or whether he would be removed by then. But this entire scenario does beg a question: when in the UK the monarch has never violated an uncodified constitutional convention, why is that in our Islamic republic, it is violated by the President and the Governor despite codified constitutional positions?

Also Read:

The Rocky Road Ahead For The Party In Power

Indo-Pak Economic Diplomacy: Time To Change ‘No Change In Policy’

Tags: hamzasharifchurchillPakistanpowerkingdomconstitutionwinstonPTIpresidentdiscretionpunjabuniteddiscretionaryprimegovernorappointministerqueenimranparliamentkhanMajorityUKmonarchyshehbaz
Previous Post

The Great Rethink: A Discussion On Redefining The Military’s Role

Next Post

Shireen Mazari Waded Into TLP Waters

Ali Tahir

Ali Tahir

Next Post
Shireen Mazari Waded Into TLP Waters

Shireen Mazari Waded Into TLP Waters

Search

No Result
View All Result

Recent News

Blasphemous Remarks: Nupur Sharma Ordered By Indian SC To ‘Apologise To Entire Country’

Blasphemous Remarks: Nupur Sharma Ordered By Indian SC To ‘Apologise To Entire Country’

July 1, 2022
PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

July 1, 2022
TLP Workers On Streets Once Again, Destroy Samsung Billboards In Karachi Over ‘Blasphemous’ QR Code

TLP Workers On Streets Once Again, Destroy Samsung Billboards In Karachi Over ‘Blasphemous’ QR Code

July 1, 2022

Twitter

Donate Us

Subscribe
The Friday Times – Naya Daur

News and views which are not fit to print.


The Friday Times is Pakistan’s first independent weekly, founded in 1989. In 2021, the publication went into collaboration with digital news platform Naya Daur Media to publish under a daily cycle.


Social Media

Latest News

  • All
  • News
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Lifestyle
Blasphemous Remarks: Nupur Sharma Ordered By Indian SC To ‘Apologise To Entire Country’

Blasphemous Remarks: Nupur Sharma Ordered By Indian SC To ‘Apologise To Entire Country’

by News Desk
July 1, 2022
0

The Indian Supreme Court has ordered Nupur Sharma,...

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

PTI Accepts Hamza Shahbaz As CM After SC Orders Re-election Later This Month

by News Desk
July 1, 2022
0

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has told the Supreme Court...

Follow Us on Instagram

Follow

    The Instagram Access Token is expired, Go to the Customizer > JNews : Social, Like & View > Instagram Feed Setting, to refresh it.
  • About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist