• About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us
The Friday Times - Naya Daur
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
The Friday Times - Naya Daur
No Result
View All Result
Home Analysis

How Lawyers’ Strikes Impede Access To Justice And Deny Citizens Their Rights

Boycotts have become increasingly frequent since the Lawyers’ Movement. Those abandoning courts, waste time and money, along with hampering the course of justice

Mashood Hassan Azam Awan by Mashood Hassan Azam Awan
September 23, 2021
in Analysis
How Lawyers’ Strikes Impede Access To Justice And Deny Citizens Their Rights
122
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The right of access to justice is, and has to be, a basic human right. It also forms an integral part of the concept of rule of law owing to its natural linkage with the right to life. 

When the right of access to justice was not specifically contained in our constitution, our superior courts had, time and again, held it to be a penumbra of guaranteed right to life.

The concept of good governance is closely linked with rule of law. No state can exist without just system of administration of justice. 

A just system of governance is under a constant constitutional, legal, moral, political and social obligation to ensure availability to all its citizens a means for fair and just settlement of disputes. It is, thus, the courts of law which provide means to settlement of disputes in a given system. 

What all this means is that it is the constitutional right of every citizen to have unimpeded access to a court for seeking justice. 

Ours is an adversarial system of dispute resolution and lawyers are an integral part thereof. The evidence of lawyers’ paramount importance is that they are regarded as officers of the court.

Before 2007, the calling of strikes by lawyers and boycott of court proceedings was an uncommon phenomenon. With the Lawyers’ Movement, initially meant for the restoration of rule of law, boycott of courts by lawyers, for one reason or the other, has become a routine affair. 

 

To seek justice and to be treated in accordance with law is an inalienable right of every citizen guaranteed under Article 4 of the constitution

 

May it be said, without any fear of contradiction, that access to justice and courts is impeded by calls for strikes of courts by the bar councils or bar associations. 

The litigant public appears in courts of law through their lawyers. Upon call for strike, lawyers do not enter appearance in courts, thus the matters are adjourned. 

The net-effect of call for strike and observance thereof by lawyers is that time of litigant public is wasted, courts become overburdened because less causes are decided than the ones that are filed every year and most importantly, constitutional right of access to justice is impeded. 

It adds to the agony of innocent public litigants as justice is delayed and denied. Who suffers most? The poor litigant. 

The regulatory regime, to govern the bar councils, bar associations and lawyers in Pakistan, is found in Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1976 and Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules made thereunder. 

The latter, inter alia, specifically provide for a chapter titled ‘Canons of Professional Conduct and Etiquettes of Advocates’. A bare look at the chapter unveils, in unequivocal terms, certain prescriptive rules on the conduct of a lawyer viz-a-viz other advocates, clients and public. The chapter further dictates the duties of a lawyer to the honourable courts. 

Under rules 166, contained in the aforementioned chapter, it is the duty of a lawyer to appear in the court when his case is called. Clearly, a failure to put appearance in the court — intentionally, deliberately, or in the face of call for strike or boycott, when the case is called — means nothing but a breach of duty. 

Legally, every breach has its consequences. Breach of duty, in this context, is termed as professional misconduct. By doing so, one renders himself or herself exposed to disciplinary proceedings. 

When a particular lawyer or a group of lawyers does it, it is not uneasy for the bar council concerned to initiate disciplinary proceedings. Unfortunately, it becomes next to impossible to initiate any proceedings when the entire community proceeds on strike in response to a call by the council or association. 

The effect of such a predicament is that the very operation of law, and rules dealing with duties of lawyers and disciplinary proceedings, become ineffective and redundant.

 

The litigant public appears in courts of law through their lawyers. Upon call for strike, lawyers do not enter appearance in courts, thus the matters are adjourned

 

Non-appearance of lawyers before courts, to represent their respective clients, has many adverse implications. First, time of litigant public is unnecessarily wasted. Second, the cases set for that day are unjustifiably adjourned. Third, the course of justice is hampered, thereby occasioning delay in justice. Fourth, state money and time of state agencies including courts of law go into drain. And lastly, it gives rise to backlog of cases. 

Also Read:

We Should All Be Worried About Democratic Backsliding

Counterterrorism: Understanding TTP’s Strategy Of Attrition, Intimidation And Provocation

Overall, it slows down judicial work and brings no good name to the system.

To seek justice and to be treated in accordance with law is an inalienable right of every citizen guaranteed under Article 4 of the constitution. Strikes of lawyers affect not only public right of access to justice, but also deprive the public of their rights. 

Of all professions, legal profession is the most honourable, sacred and demands highest level of commitment to professionalism as the duties of lawyers concern directly with human life, dignity, liberty and property. A slightest dereliction on the part of any lawyer in relation to such duties may affect the prestige of the profession.

Tags: lawyers strikelegal fraternitylawyers in pakistan
Previous Post

Supreme Court Rules Women’s Inheritance Cannot Be Claimed After Their Death

Next Post

Supreme Court’s Criticism Of NAB Further Reveals How It Is Used As A Tool For Political Engineering

Mashood Hassan Azam Awan

Mashood Hassan Azam Awan

Next Post

Supreme Court’s Criticism Of NAB Further Reveals How It Is Used As A Tool For Political Engineering

Comments 1

  1. Raheel zafar says:
    1 year ago

    This is a really nice article especially for the young lawyers who have no idea of strike and causes of it.

Recent News

‘Jail Bharo’: ‘Imran Wants Party Workers Behind Bars, Not Himself’

‘Jail Bharo’: ‘Imran Wants Party Workers Behind Bars, Not Himself’

February 6, 2023
Imran New Yorker | Maryam Demands Imran Ouster | Jail Bharo | Punjab, KP Elections

Imran New Yorker | Maryam Demands Imran Ouster | Jail Bharo | Punjab, KP Elections

February 6, 2023
PM Shehbaz Orders Authorities To Restore Wikipedia Forthwith

PM Shehbaz Orders Authorities To Restore Wikipedia Forthwith

February 6, 2023

Twitter

Newsletter



Donate To Us

The Friday Times – Naya Daur

THE TRUTH WILL OUT


The Friday Times is Pakistan’s first independent weekly, founded in 1989. In 2021, the publication went into collaboration with digital news platform Naya Daur Media to publish under a daily cycle.


Social Media

Latest News

  • All
  • News
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Lifestyle
‘Jail Bharo’: ‘Imran Wants Party Workers Behind Bars, Not Himself’

‘Jail Bharo’: ‘Imran Wants Party Workers Behind Bars, Not Himself’

by News Desk
February 6, 2023
0

Imran Khan never said that he himself wanted...

Imran New Yorker | Maryam Demands Imran Ouster | Jail Bharo | Punjab, KP Elections

Imran New Yorker | Maryam Demands Imran Ouster | Jail Bharo | Punjab, KP Elections

by Mian Hamza Arif
February 6, 2023
0

Imran New Yorker | Maryam Demands Imran Ouster...

Social Feed

  • About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist