• About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us
Sunday, August 14, 2022
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Comment

Pakistan Was About To Have First Woman SC Judge But Politics Of Judicial Appointments Got In The Way

If we want to check ‘unfettered’ discretion, we have to resurrect the role of the Parliament – and by extension public debate - in the judicial nomination process. 

Sara Malkani by Sara Malkani
September 13, 2021 - Updated on September 14, 2021
in Editor's Picks, Analysis, Main Slider
Pakistan Was About To Have First Woman SC Judge But Politics Of Judicial Appointments Got In The Way
203
SHARES
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The current debate around how judges should be appointed raises essentially political questions about whether judicial ‘primacy’ in appointments is essential and the role the public and elected representatives should play in the appointment process. The questions to be addressed in this debate are not limited to concerns about how we get the most competent judges in the Supreme Court or how we maintain harmony in the superior judiciary.  It is a question of the role we want the judiciary to play in our fragile (or ‘hybrid’) democracy.  

The current crisis began with the nomination of Justice Mazhar to the Supreme Court. Bar associations protested because more senior judges in the Sindh High Court were overlooked for nomination. In spite of the bar’s protests, the nomination was approved. This was followed by the nomination of Justice Ayesha Malik – a historic nomination because if appointed, Justice Ayesha Malik would have been the first woman to sit in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the only country in South Asia that has never seen a woman sit on its highest court. Her appointment would have been a milestone.  

Bar associations protested against her nomination again because she was not the senior-most judge in the Lahore High Court, calling for a boycott of court proceedings on the day the Judicial Commission was to meet to consider her nomination. The Judicial Commission did not approve Justice Malik’s appointment and so the opportunity to see a woman on the Supreme Court was lost.  

How did we get here?  

Over the years, the superior judiciary has secured its primacy in deciding who should be admitted in its ranks. The 1996 decision in Al-Jehad Trust established the primacy of the Chief Justice in the appointment process. The judiciary insulated itself from the executive and legislature – formally – reasoning that judicial independence demands it. The 18th amendment was designed to give some role to legislators in appointments with the introduction of a parliamentary committee that was to review the decisions made by the Judicial Commission.

 

If appointed, Justice Ayesha Malik would have been the first woman to sit in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the only country in South Asia that has never seen a woman sit on its highest court. Her appointment would have been a milestone.  

 

The 18th amendment was challenged before the Supreme Court in Nadeem Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan. The Supreme Court, without striking down the 18th amendment, stated that the veto power of the parliamentary committee violates judicial independence and gave Parliament the opportunity to amend the role of the parliamentary committee.  

A subdued Parliament compiled and passed the 19th Amendment, which essentially gave the Judicial Commission the final say in appointments. In the Munir Bhatti case, the Supreme Court reinforced the diminished role of legislators, holding that any decision of the parliamentary committee would be subject to judicial review.  

Until very recently, bar associations did not have a problem with this status quo. Justice Faiz Isa’s reference before the Supreme Judicial Council, however, gave rise to misgivings that the superior judiciary may not be entirely fair when it comes to accountability within its ranks and this has created questions about character and credibility. It has led to suspicions about the Judicial Commission’s decisions and distrust of the nominations process. The fact that Judicial Commission proceedings are held in secret has reinforced this distrust. 

Why did Bar Associations oppose Justice Ayesha Malik’s nomination?

Bar associations opposed the nomination of Justice Ayesha Malik on the same basis that they opposed the nomination of Justice Mazhar, which suggests that the opposition was based on principle rather than misogyny. But perhaps one question that can be posed to the bar associations is this: if something good is coming out of a defective system – and reform to the defective system will not take place overnight – did their opposition have to be as vocal as it was? Perhaps they should have acknowledged the historic nature of the nomination while vowing to continue their momentum for reform.  

 

 

The assessment of the calibre and suitability must be and should be a subjective process and will never be reduced to a robotic assessment

 

Is there a way out of this deadlock?  The proposed solution by bar associations is this:  that the judicial commission “frame transparent and objective criteria for the appointment of judges at all levels” and that until then the judicial commission should strictly adhere to the “seniority principle in appointments to the apex court.” 

While the introduction of criteria may help a little, it will not go to the core of the problem. Introduction of criteria will not and should not eliminate discretion. Criteria may help to ensure that all the factors that should be considered are in fact considered, for example, legal acumen, quality of judgments, gender and ethnic diversity. 

But the assessment of the calibre and suitability must be and should be a subjective process and will never be reduced to a robotic assessment. This means that where players in the system inspire mistrust and are shut off from any external input or assessment, their decision can at any time be suspect, giving rise to crises of credibility.  

Let’s face it: the current crisis is due to ‘informal’ influences and tweaks to the formal process will only get us so far. 

We should acknowledge that a cause of the current credibility crisis is that the doctrine of judicial primacy was taken to an extreme.  We all watched when parliament was side-lined and judicial commission proceedings were removed from any public oversight. If we want to check ‘unfettered’ discretion, we have to resurrect the role of the Parliament – and by extension public debate – in the judicial nomination process.  This is in fact one of the demands from bar associations, which have called for a repeal of the 19th Amendment. 

A lesson from this deadlock is the lesson we should draw from every constitutional crisis in this country – we undermine parliamentary politics at our peril. In a country as complex and diverse as Pakistan, our judiciary has no choice but to give deliberative democracy a chance.   

Also Read:

A Short History Of Ahmadi Persecution

Owners, Few Anchors Responsible For The Mess ARY Finds Itself In

Tags: judicial appointmentsjustice ayesha malikayesha malikseniority in judicial appointments
Previous Post

What is the future of the new government in Kabul?| How the world deal with Afghanistan?

Next Post

Islamabad High Court Suspends Plots Allotted To SC Judges Including Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmad

Sara Malkani

Sara Malkani

The writer is a lawyer and legal adviser for the Center for Reproductive Rights, a global human rights organization that works to endure that reproductive rights are protected in law as fundamental human rights.

Next Post
Noor Mukadam’s Friends Hold Protest Urging Court Not To Give Relief To Zahir’s Parents

Noor Mukadam's Friends Hold Protest Urging Court Not To Give Relief To Zahir's Parents

Recent News

Dignity In Diversity: Engaging With Differences To Discover The Self

Dignity In Diversity: Engaging With Differences To Discover The Self

August 14, 2022
Imran Khan Announces Fight For Freedom At Its Last Stage

Imran Khan Announces Fight For Freedom At Its Last Stage

August 14, 2022
A Short History Of Ahmadi Persecution

A Short History Of Ahmadi Persecution

August 14, 2022

Twitter

Donate To Us

Subscribe
The Friday Times – Naya Daur

THE TRUTH WILL OUT


The Friday Times is Pakistan’s first independent weekly, founded in 1989. In 2021, the publication went into collaboration with digital news platform Naya Daur Media to publish under a daily cycle.


Social Media

Latest News

  • All
  • News
  • Editorials
  • Features
  • Analysis
  • Lifestyle
Dignity In Diversity: Engaging With Differences To Discover The Self

Dignity In Diversity: Engaging With Differences To Discover The Self

by Nadeem Farooq Paracha
August 14, 2022
0

In March 1987, I sat for my final...

Imran Khan Announces Fight For Freedom At Its Last Stage

Imran Khan Announces Fight For Freedom At Its Last Stage

by News Desk
August 14, 2022
0

On Saturday former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf...

Social Feed

  • About Us
  • The TFT Story
  • Team
  • Write for TFT
  • Online advertisement tariff
  • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorials
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Videos
  • Citizens’ Voice
  • Lifestyle
  • Editor’s Picks
  • Good Times
  • More
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Write for TFT
    • The TFT Story
    • Donate To Us

© 2022 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist