In the first of this two-part series, I argued that Pakistani people are becoming rootless social orphans. Our hiraeth for a non-existent Islamic utopia has compelled us to abdicate our organic connection to our land and to abandon our links to our past. In this part I shall carry the argument forward to various facets of our social existence.
The South Asian Subcontinent is home of two glorious civilizations based in the areas that constitute Pakistan. The Indus Valley culture started in Mohenjo-daro and Harappa before it spread to the Gangetic valley. And the Gandhara culture flourished along the river valleys between the Margalla Hills and the Hindu Kush Mountains. The earliest fossils of cotton were found at Mehrgarh near the Bolan Pass; a site that is dated to between 7000-2500 BC and is a precursor of the Indus Valley culture. The other signs of earliest cotton were found at Rakhigarhi, a town in Haryana, where the Indus culture had spread along the now extinct Ghaggar River that may have been either an independent sister stream of the Indus or, as the sand samples suggest, may have changed course to become the Sutlej River. It was the Indus and not the Gangetic people that gave cotton to the world and the earliest civilization to the Subcontinent.

And yet we, the Muslims of the Subcontinent, are unique in the Islamic world in that when we converted to Islam, we changed our names from Indian names to Persian, Turkish and Arabic names.
There are, in reality, no Islamic names. When the Arabs converted to Islam, they retained their pre-Islamic names. There was a time in those early days when some persons with popular names as Amr, Hisham, Zainab and Abdullah were Muslims while others were non-Muslims. The Prophet (PBUH), too, did not specify any particular names to be used for Muslims. Similarly, pre-Islamic Turkish and Persian names became “Islamic” when people converted in these lands. Islamic scholars, too, agree on this issue but we the Indian Muslims have always changed our names on conversion.
My 8th ancestor, who converted from Hinduism to Islam after his migration from the Kashmir Valley to Amritsar in the early 19th century, also became Saddique Sheikh from whatever was his original name. He didn’t have to. On a personal note, I have always been partial to the name Sukhdev since my childhood. It’s a beautiful flowing name with elegant, humanitarian meanings. The equivalent word in Arabic and Persian is “Paikar-e-Rahat”. If our society had been a little tolerant, I would have added this as a suffix to my name. I find nothing wrong in being called “embodiment of happiness/comfort” in my own language.
Mir Taqi Mir in one of his long poems writes that Holi was the Nauroz of India. Nazir Akbarabadi wrote a poem on the festival
We also seem to have blurred the lines between culture and religion. It seems at times that every cultural festival with Indian roots has been labelled as un-Islamic. Muslims in other parts of Islamic lands have not shed their seasonal festivities. Iranian and Central Asians had been celebrating Nowruz as the spring festival for over a thousand years before the advent of Islam; at a time when they were overwhelmingly Zoroastrians. They continue to do so, to this day. Arabs didn’t celebrate the festival and they don’t do it now, perhaps because in the desert environment there is no meaningful spring season. In our time, Arabized Pakistani extremists raise vocal and physical resentment against the festival but they fail to realize that it has nothing to do with religion.
A number of Islamic festivals themselves have their roots in pre-Islamic celebrations. This may be said of the two Eids, too. And our Islamic greeting of As-Salam Alilkum and tbe response Wa-Alikum Salam come straight from the Jewish Semitic greetings of Shalom Alechem and its response Alechem Shalom, implying that it there are some events and traditions that are regional and cultural rather than religious.

With this background of a continuation of seasonal and cultural traditions even within Islam, it is strange that we have given up Holi as un-Islamic. It is a spring festival – much like Basant is in the Central Punjab or as Mela Charaghan (Festival of Lights) is in Lahore. Holi is a folk celebration of our land and not necessarily a religious festival. Common local Muslims celebrated this festival till the beginning of the previous century. Mir Taqi Mir in one of his long poems writes that Holi was the Nauroz of India. Nazir Akbarabadi wrote a poem on the festival. Its opening verse is:
Miyan tu hamse na rakh kuchh ghubaar Holi mein
Ki roothe milte hain aapas mein yaar Holi mein
He means that we should clear our hearts of resentments during Holi because even estranged friends greet each other on this day.
Holi, as the festival of colours, is becoming a worldwide phenomenon. It has been celebrated in UAE for some years now and was allowed in Saudi Arabia as well this year – where Saudis themselves participated while spraying colours on each other. A modified version in the shape of ‘Run for Colours’ is held in most parts of the world. I myself took part in one such run in Australia where organizers had placed colour spray guns at several places along the 3-kilometre route of the run/walk. It was great fun, with hundreds of people of every nationality participating in the festival and going back home in rainbow colours. We in Pakistan seem to be the only ones who have shunned it, though we the people of north Indian Punjab, Rajasthan, UP and adjoining states may be the originators of this festival!

Basant has now been officially banned due to safety reasons but it had been facing stiff resistance from religious extremists in the country, along with the beautiful marriage festival of Mahndi and the solemn Qul day after a death. The tragedy of our times is that for a large section of our society, everything is either “Islamic” or “heretic”. That is a very unhealthy social attitude.
This state of disorientation has become so acute that the Sindhi and Southern Punjab culture of joining hands to wish someone and show respect, or touching of feet or knees of an elder, is dubbed as “un-Islamic” by many people in Northern Punjab and KP – as if the peaceful and loving people belonging to the lands of the Sufis need a lesson in Islam from the people of the north!
The consequence of a violent divorced from our land and our past, and of making ourselves cultural and historical orphans, are not emphasized nearly enough in Pakistan.

Consider this: since 1947 we have produced two Nobel laureate Pakistanis but a very large majority of us do not own either of them. We had a world respected philanthropist in Edhi, yet many elements of our religious leadership considered him misguided at best or heretic at worst, because he rose in compassion to serve humanity rather than Muslims.
We have five Nobel laureates affiliated with Lahore itself: Rudyard Kipling whose Kim is set in Lahore, Arthur Compton who taught Chemistry in Punjab University, Har Gobind Khorana who was born in the city and studied in Punjab University, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar who was born in Lahore and Abdus Salam who was educated and taught at Government College Lahore. There are not many cities in the world that can boast of such scholarship attached to them, yet we honour none of them publicly (on religious grounds?) nor have we set them as role models for our students. Any other city would have erected monuments to them. A large majority of Lahoris, even old residents with historical roots in the city, would be astonished to learn of this glory.

Can we name any other country where scholarship is accepted or rejected on religious grounds?
We should take notice that some of the equally religious and devout peoples in the Muslim world cling to their past without any qualms. Egyptians are proud of their civilization with no loathing for deities such as Ra the sun god, Thoth the god of wisdom or Hathor the goddess of fertility/motherhood. This, despite the fact that a large percentage of Egyptians is either of Arab stock or, in case of ancient section of population, has completely Arabized and are collectively considered – and perhaps some in Pakistan may not not like this – actually better practising Muslims than us. Our western neighbour Iran, who themselves are now officially more devout than us, have pride in their imperial past from the Achaemenids (the dynasty that was terminated by Alexander) to the Sassanids (the dynasty that was liquidated by Muslim Arabs).
Our land has been a centre of spirituality. Sufism started its journey in Baghdad, Spain and Khorasan, but it found perhaps its most ardent followers in the entire length and breadth of the Indian Subcontinent, as evidenced by the presence of innumerable khanqahs throughout the land. Even one poet of the calibre of Bulleh Shah, Shah Inayat, Shah Abdul Latif, Sachal Sarmast, Lal Shahbaz Qalandar, Shah Inayatullah, Shaikh Ayaz, Mian Muhammad Bakhsh, Waris Shah, Sultan Bahu, Shah Hussain, etc would be the pride of any other nation.
We have five Nobel laureates affiliated with Lahore itself
We have a rich tradition in this genre of literature as well as in its musical rendering.
Punjab has given birth to one religion as well – and contains most of the sites considered holy by its adherents. We must recognize that despite a lot of historical bad blood between Muslims and Sikhs, the latter religion has survived for the last five hundred years and is still flourishing today. Its followers have gained a well-earned respect the world over. They admire our saints almost as much as most of the Muslims do. Let’s rejoice in our brand of spirituality and not give it up for alien austere attitudes towards culture.
On a final note, I would like to emphasize that a good gauge for who we are is “how others see us” In my travels abroad, I have found that my wife, attired in the traditional shalwar-qameez and dupatta, was called a Hindi in Saudi Arabia or an Indian Sikh in the West. Even when corrected that we are Pakistanis, some people continue to insist “OK. But Indian.”
We don’t like it, of course, but to them, that’s what we are: Indians. Let’s remember that we shall never be accepted as Arabs or Persians or Turks, whatever prefix or suffix our names may stress.
We have a bountiful land in terms of culture and history. Our history goes back to the earliest times of antiquity. We are inheritors of two different civilizations. We have rich traditions of poetry, traditions and seasonal festivals. We need to develop a sense of belonging to and taking pride in this land. Only then we can truly love this country and become one nation, and be thankful for what the Almighty has granted us.
Parvez Mahmood retired as a Group Captain from PAF and is now a software engineer. He lives in Islamabad and writes on social and historical issues. He can be reached at parvezmahmood53@gmail.com
Sir,
Geographically, Asian Continent constitutes of Middle East, Central Asia, South Asia and South East Asia. All these Asian regions consist(ed) of many independent states. South Asia has never been a singular political entity, untill it was militarily forced into one false entity and that happened only twice in Pakistan’s 9000 years of urbanised existance. I wish if you would try and find your roots in the history of Pakistan, you would have all the answers that you are raising. You, yourself are identifying your roots in an area which is not part of this country, however, I am sure that you were born in Pakistan. Your own thinking needs to change before you ask others to do the same. And, there are numerous million Pakistanis, whose ancestors did not migrate from foreign lands and they are also sons and daughters of the soil, like you.
There was and is only one civilisation that exist(ed) in South Asia, the Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC), yet you add Gangetic civilisation as the second civilisation of South Asia. There was no Gangetic civilisation in the entire world – if at all, it was a mere culture. Due to the British drawn borders, there was an IVC spill-over in Iran, Afghanistan and Republic of India. The core of Indus Valley Civilisation however, is Pakistan. Instead of being a sub-continental citizen, first become a citizen of Pakistan and educate yourself about thousands of years of Pakistani history falling within the Pakistani borders – it will surprise you beyond belief with its rich heritage. Thank you.
very thoughtful and emotionally honestly and having full authority .waiting for one day when there is no boundaries between india and pakistan no religion no terrorism only humanity and pakistani will consider indian brothers not enemies and indian consider paki as a brothers .
Awesome, beautiful, touching narrative.
Only that I would say, Bakr-id has a pre-Islamic tradition (Abraham), but Eid-ul-Fitr is a totally Islamic celebration.
one of the best article.
Kudo to author. I have read in Friday times. The author has compared history of he other islamic countries and how they continue to appreciate the past as it is there own and did not disowed it. The only reason the past is not appreciated as every thing is looked through Indian prism, I agree with author it is time to respect and be proud of your heritage.
This article is good to start a debate on the subject but I am afraid it brings out a very small part of the truth as only a very small part of the nation hold such fanatic views.
It is quite a different discussion that the small minority is controlling the majority.
The writer should have discussed Justice AR Cornelius and Justice Rana Bhagwan Das, Cecil Chaudhary, Jamshid Marker, Youssef Yohana (now Mohammad Youssef), Munshi Prem Chand etc also to give refinement to his analysis. Are they not respected as much as their Muslim counterparts in their respective fields.
The writer has, one gets the impression, looked at the issue in absolute terms rather than comparative ones.
What has been the attitude of other religions and nations in this respect?
The writer should also throw light on
this also for the benefit of his readers.
I wish I could do that. But unfortunately, I am no scholar.
I am not for fanaticism but I do believe in holistic analysis.
For some reason Admin doesn’t like what I write, because they refuse to publish it! However, in case they let it through this tie, I just want to commend the writer on his sentiments – great article, but with one bias that I mentioned last time! Why does he keep ignoring the fact that there was, perhaps, a nation much closer to our roots who have had more of an impact on our history and culture than the Persians, Turks and Arabs that he repeatedly talks about!
For some reason Admin doesn’t like what I write, because they refuse to publish it! However, in case they let it through this time, I just want to commend the writer on his sentiments – great article, but with one bias that I mentioned last time! Why does he keep ignoring the fact that there was, perhaps, a nation much closer to our roots who have had more of an impact on our history and culture than the Persians, Turks and Arabs that he repeatedly talks about! The Afghans.
Very well written articles that should be eye-opening for Pakistanis and those Indians interested in history. Congratulations to Parvez Mahmood.
Yet, for someone so drawn to historical origins of the culture of his land he takes great care to avoid mentioning Hinduism, and when he does so it is only in the context of his ancestor. Nor does he mention that the name for the city that was called Allahabad by Akbar was known in antiquity (and since nearly a year now) as Prayagraj. Perhaps it is too Hindu to find acceptance in this paper or among his readers. Also, glossed over is the reason for the disconnect of Pakistan and indeed of sub-continental Muslims from Indic civilizations and religions, even bordering on hate. And that is because Islam came not as another religion on offer in the “religious marketplace” for the seekers to chose from, but as a bloody and barbaric force. It subjugated native Indians with such severity that an immediate and complete break with the past was an expedient to survive. And it wasn’t that the hate for the past indigenous heritage was a voluntary behavior on the part of the converted; it seemed to have been demanded by the barbaric invaders. Saudi Arabia still has hate for other religions as a part of school curriculum. So it seems to be the nature of Islamic Arab’s worldview.
Your Prime Minister Imran Khan used to bemoan the existence of the Brown Sahibs in the sub-continent; for him it was evidence of a colonized mind. Perhaps he was and is oblivious to the existence of the innumerable (running into 100’s of millions) Brown Sheiks in the sub-continent. It is time to see with eyes wide open.
The mistake Mr Jinnah did by naming partitioned land Pakistan .. Actually he should have named it West Hindustan . The crisis of identity might have been little less.
Nevertheless Writer has written everything ..except declaring a date of his Ghar bapsi. We are not Arab , nor Farsee we are Indian ..Hindu Indian or Sindhu Indian .. welcome Back Mr Sukhdev .
Can not wait for your next part. you are a breath of fresh air. amrit
Dear Parvez Mahmood Sahib,
Both your articles are eye-openers and thought provoker.
Walking on New York streets I many times wonder why 99% of things of Indo-Pak origin is labelled as Indian. Very rarely you will find a restaurant labelled as Pakistani food. I just know one in midtown Manhattan, it’s a kind of fast food place where mostly Pakistani taxi drivers go, and they also provide a place for prayers. Rest everything else is Indian, including the grocery shops owned by Pakistanis. All the Muslims from West Indian countries also never mention Pakistan as the country of their origin. Though they have never visited India they own it like their own ancestral place. My friend Bibi Ayesha from Trinidad is a better is a better Indian than me. She fasts throughout the month of Ramzan.
It works as an advantage to Indians but as you said it’s a loss for Pakistani youth, and India is not to be blamed for that. India for centuries been a center where all cultures mix and flourish automatically.
As you said Pakistanis originate from great original civilizations when there was no Hinduism or Islam, it was only a civilization and culture. Pakistani youth was forced to become origin-less. It’s feeling that only an orphan can understand.
I think you should lecture on this subject and help young people. It’s never too late.
I hope I will meet you once day or be in audience in one of your lectures.
Thanks once again,
Best Regards,
Suresh
Dear Parvez Mahmood Sahib,
Both your articles are eye-opener and thought provoker.
Walking on New York streets I many times wonder why 99% of things of Indo-Pak origin are labelled as Indian. Very rarely you find a restaurant labelled as Pakistani food. I just know one in midtown Manhattan, it’s a kind of fast food place where mostly Pakistani taxi drivers go, and they also provide a place for prayers. Rest everything else is Indian, including the grocery shops owned by Pakistanis. All the Muslims from West Indian countries also never mention Pakistan as the country of their origin. Though they’d have never visited India they own it like their own ancestral place. My friend Bibi Ayesha from Trinidad is a better is a better Indian than me. She fasts throughout the month of Ramzan and also misses Hindu festivals she used to celebrate with her Hindu neighbors.
Being used to Indo-Pak culture I often used to wonder at Indonesian names that are a mix of hindi and Indonesian. Christians in Southern India also have mixed names.
It works as an advantage to Indians but as you said it’s a loss for Pakistani youth, and India is not to be blamed for that. India for centuries been a center where all cultures merge and flourish automatically.
As you said Pakistanis originate from great original civilizations when there was no Hinduism or Islam, it was only a civilization and culture. Pakistani youth was forced to become origin-less. It’s feeling that only an orphan can understand.
I think you should lecture on this subject and help young people. It’s never too late. Once they understand that actually/genetically we are one the animosity will automatically disappear.
I hope I will meet you once day or be in audience in one of your lectures.
Thanks once again,
Best Regards,
Suresh
A very well written two part series (obviously from a very educated and well-traveled man), but I feel sorry for him!
His thesis mostly tries to, first justify the existence of religion and then he tries to further subdivide the subcontinent into three different zones. Of course this exercise is to somehow get his countrymen to accept their historical heritage and feel comfortable in their own skin.
Frankly, I would agree with him on both his arguments, yet the issue of identity would not go away with just these assertions. You see, he has failed to address the main issue and has just gone around it and tried to ignore that totally.
The main issue here is the mixing of religion and politics!
To find the source of this problem, of course we have to go back to history and blame the British for this mess. As the Empire started falling at the turn of the 20th century, after the First World War they created Israel and then after the Second they created Pakistan! (Local small minded politicians with short term goals of course joined in to encourage this; but that is a different story)
What the creation of these two nation states did was artificially draw lines on a land, a culture and come up with countries that would be based on religion! This was the only time we have seen this happen in human history.
Now religion is subjective and this concept was only bound to go downhill. Religion with political power only leads to violence and both these counties have perpetuated violence on their own people and their neighbors in the name of religion – and this was bound to happen.
For any rational, intelligent person it is very difficult to justify the very existence of these two nations!
I am afraid; these two nations will continue to sprout violence till they exist – because there is no other option but to do it for the very survival of these nations! The only solution would be the dissolution of these countries!
Of course, this could be started slowly. Let Israel become a democracy with universal franchise – and soon the local Palestinians (who are in majority – the two nation theory is only a Band-Aid) would gain power in the parliament and then, who knows, they might want to change the name of that country!
Pakistan should remove religion from its constitution and declare itself a non-religious state (I am not using the word ‘secular’ here) and then it would become more like India – then who knows, a 100 years after that we could just merge!
Anyway, I have been pleased to see a lot of independent voices in Pakistan lately who question what is happening to their country.
Wish you all the best.